
DETECTING DEFECTS
Part 2 of a Series
Processing Defects Part ONE:
OVERFERMENT/SOUR AND
STINKER BEANS
by Andi C. Trindle
photos by Ensei Neto, Specialty Coffee Bureau
I HOPE EVERYONE has now experienced the wondrous peanut-buttery
taste of quakers (flashback to the first article in our Detecting Defects
series), and I invite you to move forward along the coffee production
chain to experience the tastes of rotted fruit, vinegar and even rotten
fish. I know, these are not the descriptors we like to find at the
cupping table, but in the interest of education, we are going to look
at some defects that produce these particularly unpleasant profiles.
For those of you following along in our series, in the interest of
logic, I’m moving us forward in a linear fashion along the coffee
production chain. We started with plant-based and harvesting defects,
and we’re now going to examine defects generated in the next
stage of coffee production: coffee processing.
Processing coffee is the phase in coffee production where the
coffee seeds are removed from within the freshly harvested cherries,
then dried and prepared for export as green coffee. Processing defects
occur during this phase. With numerous steps and many different methods
utilized (depending upon the origin country, region and/or buyer specifications),
coffee processing is a critical and expansive phase in coffee production.
As Robert Barker, vice president of quality assurance at Growers Direct
Coffee in Berkeley, Calif., states, “Coffee processing can substantially
remove defective beans or contribute to them.” In some cases, mistakes
made in processing can ruin coffee, rendering it totally undrinkable.
In better scenarios, defects developed during the coffee growing and
harvesting phases can be mitigated or eliminated. With the employment
of proper processing practices, producers can ensure that well-grown
coffee seeds leave the country as top-grade green coffee suitable for
the discriminating specialty market.
Categories of Processing Defects
The category of processing defects includes damage caused by incorrect
or inadequate methods in pulping, washing, fermenting, drying, cleaning
and hulling. Specific defects that can occur within these phases include
bruised beans, stinker beans, soft beans, over-dried beans, overfermented
beans, sour beans and many others.
To better understand defects created during processing, it’s helpful
to first review the methods and steps in coffee processing. We will do
this very briefly.
The methods of coffee processing are washed (or wet process),
dry (or natural process) and semi-washed (or pulped natural). Each of
these methods produces unique flavor profiles and all must be skillfully
managed. Farmers/millers generally employ one of the particular methods
above based upon the climactic conditions of their region, the availability
of water resources, and the traditions of their region. For example,
in countries where clean water is more available, specialty coffee producers
most often utilize the washed process, and in countries where water resources
are limited, the dry process is most often utilized. However, in the
modern world of specialty coffee, where coffee buyers choose coffee based
upon the cup profile and its particular place in their coffee lineup,
many producers are choosing non-traditional methods for their region
in order to experiment with taste profiles and to satisfy the requests
of buyers. This newer development of experimenting with processing methods
is, in part, responsible for the growth in the usage of in-between methods,
known as semi-washed and pulped natural.
The broad steps in coffee processing, which do vary depending
upon the method used, include the following:
1) Pulping: removal of coffee seeds from within the coffee cherry
(wet processing)
2) Fermentation and washing (wet processing)
3) Drying of fermented green beans still in parchment skin
(in the dry method, coffee seeds are still within cherries and dried
on patios before the cherry skins are removed)
4) Storage of coffee parchment
5) Cleaning/sorting of coffee parchment prior to hulling
6) Hulling (removal of green beans from within parchment)
7) Grading/sorting
8) Bagging for export
Clearly, an expansive range of activities during the processing phase
makes the topic of processing defects a large one. To add to the challenge,
many of these steps incorporate a variety of sub-steps and decisions
in which a coffee mill has the opportunity to maintain and contribute
to coffee quality or to destroy it.
For the purposes of this series, we’re going to divide the above
steps into two major phases. Phase one incorporates just the first two
steps, which are components of the washed-process method. The second
phase, which we will discuss in the next article, incorporates steps
three through eight, which are components of all processing methods.
Coffee Processing
Phase One
After ripe cherries are harvested, the seeds (soon to be called green
beans) must be removed from the cherries. In washed coffee processing,
this is done by pulping, washing and fermenting the beans; this is our
arbitrarily defined Phase One. There are a number of different steps
within each of these main activities that require scrupulous attention
to ensure quality in the final product. One of the most critical areas
is fermentation.
Fermentation is a natural process that occurs to some extent
in all methods (more on this later), but in the washed process, fermentation
is a controlled process that requires, well, good control because, when
fermentation is not well managed, we may end up with the aforementioned
rotted fruit, vinegar and rotten fish flavors. (I’m all for education
at the cupping table, but seriously, who wants rotten fruit and vinegar
in their cup of Joe?)
OVERFERMENT
Although there are many potential defects developed during processing—many
just within our designated Phase One—I’ve chosen to focus
on overferment because it remains a common problem and it can contribute
to a number of different specific defects, including stinker, sour and
black beans—all of which produce notable visual and taste defects.
(Note: Black beans are often the result of plant-based problems prior
to fermentation, but they can stem from overfermentation as well, so
they are included here as an example of overferment-produced defects.)
Causes
First off, it’s good to know that fermentation is a naturally
occurring chain reaction of chemical responses that transforms organic
compounds. The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language,
Fourth Edition defines fermentation as “a group of chemical reactions
induced by living or nonliving ferments that split complex organic compounds
into relatively simple substances.” Although occurring naturally
in many cases, fermentation is often deliberately induced and carefully
controlled in the production of wine, beer, and, yes: coffee. Whether
deliberately induced and tightly controlled, whether occurring naturally,
or whether occurring by some combination of both, the fermentation process
generates a number of incidental byproducts that affect the taste and
aroma of the final green beans.
In washed coffee processing, fermentation is used to describe
the managed process utilized to transform and ultimately remove the sticky
mucilage surrounding the parchment skin (the parchment skin houses the
green beans until hulling). Up to a point, fermentation creates positive
flavor transformations, but the process must be tightly controlled in
order to prevent overfermentation. “Overfermentation,” according
to Ensei Uejo Neto, chemical engineer and food technologist, Specialty
Coffee Bureau, Patrocinio, MG, Brazil, “causes defects by biochemical
transformations that end up punishing the cup strongly.”
There are many different stages in coffee processing where naturally
occurring fermentation can spiral out of control, leading to the risk
of overfermentation. High temperatures, high humidity, interactions with
other organic compounds through shared and unclean equipment, and a number
of other conditions can expedite the fermentation process of newly harvested
cherries.
According to Mané Alves, president of Coffee Lab International,
Waterbury, Vt., fermentation varies significantly depending on several
factors, including the following: time from harvesting to processing;
ambient temperature; time of fermentation mass of coffee in the tank;
water being used; controlled environment in the tank; and cleanliness
of equipment. In each of these stages, controls implemented by the producers
and millers can mitigate factors that impact fermentation negatively.
The principal challenge for producers/millers is to ensure that the fermentation
process is stopped before the mucilage begins to overferment.
Commonly Found
Overfermented beans, which generally yield an overly fruity (rotten
fruit) cup and sometimes specific defects like black, sour and stinker
beans are found everywhere. Certain conditions that increase the rate
and minimize the manageability of fermentation, including temperature,
rainfall and even infrastructure (ability of small coffee producers to
transport coffee cherries to the nearest mill quickly enough after harvesting,
for example), will impact the likelihood of overfermentation occurring.
However, fermentation problems can and will occur in every producing
country.
Identification
Overfermented beans, used as a general defect here, are primarily identified
by the taste of rotted fruit in the cup, and they are not visually recognizable.
Deciding when a coffee has positive fruity characteristics versus when
it has crossed to a rotted, overfermented quality can be a very individual
decision, however. I have served on a number of cupping juries where
half of the panel finds a coffee overfermented and half finds the coffee “pleasantly
and wildly fruity.” Identifying overfermented coffees that have
manifested into specific defects is less controversial, though, because
the negative flavors intensify and, as Alves states, “detection
happens in the cup and also visually.”
The defect identification chart provides information on the
causes and identification methods for the three distinct defects mentioned
earlier that can be caused by issues of overferment; potential causes
included here are only those stemming from fermentation issues. Note
that these defects, unlike the more general term “overfermented,” are
identifiable visually, as well as on the palate.
Prevention
Overfermentation and the defects it produces can only be prevented by
a firm command of the fermentation process as stated earlier. Natural
fermentation often begins as soon as the coffee cherries are picked from
the coffee trees (and in very humid conditions, sometimes while the cherries
are still on the tree), so prevention strategies to avoid overfermentation
must occur as soon as the coffee cherries are harvested.
There are many places in which fermentation varies (read: places
in which fermentation can spiral out of control), so it makes sense that
there are many strategies that farmers and millers must employ to avoid
problems created by uncontrolled fermentation. Prevention strategies
include processing coffees promptly after harvesting, adapting for temperature
and other climactic conditions, carefully monitoring fermentation time,
utilizing clean equipment and fresh water, and closely watching the process.
One particular strategy to avoid the challenges of controlled fermentation
used in washed processing is the use of mechanical de-mucilaging, an
in-between processing method that is becoming more common.
Whether or not a miller goes so far as to modify their processing
method to better control fermentation, conscientious and knowledgeable
farmers and millers can often successfully control the conditions that
can lead to overfermentation. Nonetheless, it is not always possible
and certainly not always done, so it is important to find opportunities
to eliminate visual and taste defects produced by overfermentation before
export.
Fixes
To be crystal clear: overfermentation cannot be reversed. However, careful
sorting and grading can eliminate some of the resulting defects of overfermentation
before green coffee is exported. According to Rob Stephen, president,
Coffee Solutions, Hopedale, Mass., “More attention to incoming
coffee at the mill level, including cupping and solid grading, will discover
defects like immature beans, sour and ferment.” Responsible millers
should be able to visually identify and catch blacks, sours and stinker
beans before samples reach specialty roasters, specialty importers and
roasters should reject samples that do not follow the clearly defined
visual standards for specialty coffee. However, general overferment,
which is not identifiable by sight alone, is frequently not caught before
export. Although more producers and millers are gaining skills in cupping
analysis, there is still a steep learning curve in many countries.
What does this all mean for the specialty coffee roaster? You
can probably guess what I’m going to say: cup carefully! And remember
that the best way to learn how to identify taste defects is to taste
them, so I send everyone off with the task of tasting some rotted fruit,
vinegar and rotted fish.

ANDI C. TRINDLE began
working as a barista in 1989, and, much to her surprise, remains in the
specialty coffee industry 18 years later. She currently works exactly
where she belongs as a green coffee trader with Volcafe Specialty Coffee.
Trindle also consults, lectures and volunteers extensively within the
coffee industry both nationally and internationally. She currently serves
as president of the International Women’s Coffee Alliance and as
co-chair of the Cupping Subcommittee for the SCAA Training Committee.
She can be reached at andiw@volcafespecialty.com.
|
|